Non-UK Licence Casinos: Rules and Checks

A licence may come from another jurisdiction, so its regulator, protections and complaint route matter as much as the label.

What “Non-UK-Regulated” Means

A non-UK-regulated casino is an online gambling site that operates without oversight from the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC). The label describes the site’s relationship with the British regulator; it does not, by itself, say whether the casino is licensed somewhere else.

Many such sites are licensed by a regulator in another jurisdiction. Malta, Curaçao, Gibraltar and Anjouan are among the places that commonly issue licences to online gambling businesses. A site licensed in one of these jurisdictions can therefore be licensed online without being a UK-licensed casino. The two descriptions refer to different regulatory arrangements.

That distinction helps make sense of terms such as “licensed online casino” and “UK-licensed online casino”. The first is broad: it may refer to a site licensed by a regulator anywhere. The second identifies a site operating under a UKGC licence. Without the qualifier, “licensed” does not tell you which regulator is involved.

“Non-UK-regulated” is also not another name for an unlicensed casino. Some sites outside the UKGC system hold a licence from a different jurisdiction; others may not. The phrase alone does not establish which applies to a particular site. It is best read as a description of the absence of UKGC oversight, not as a certificate of the site’s status elsewhere.

Non-UK Registered Casinos: Regulation and Risks

The wording “non-UK-regulated casino 2026” follows the same distinction. It refers to a category of online gambling sites outside the UKGC system, not to a single licence or a single country. A casino’s location, the regulator that issued its licence, and the markets it serves are separate details. The category name does not identify those details for an individual site.

The places commonly associated with these licences are not interchangeable labels. Malta, Curaçao, Gibraltar and Anjouan are separate jurisdictions, each with its own licensing framework. Naming one of them indicates where a licence may come from; it does not mean that the site is regulated by the UKGC. Nor does the jurisdiction’s name alone describe the particular conditions attached to a site’s licence.

This is why a list of UK-licensed casinos is not the same thing as a list of licensed casinos generally. The first means casinos holding UKGC licences. A broader list could include sites licensed by regulators elsewhere, as well as sites whose status needs to be checked. Search results and promotional descriptions may use “licensed” without making the distinction obvious, so the full wording matters.

The same care applies when a site calls itself a new licensed online casino. “New” describes how recently it has entered a market or become available, while “licensed” needs a regulator attached to it to be specific. Neither word, alone or together, establishes UKGC oversight. A site’s own description can be a starting point for identifying its claimed status, but the label should not be treated as a substitute for knowing which authority it refers to.

Malta-licensed online casinos in the UK: what to know

People looking for the best licensed casinos or the best UK-licensed casinos may appear to be asking the same question, but the scope differs. A site can fall into the first description because it has a licence from a jurisdiction outside the UK, while the second specifically concerns UKGC licensing. Calling an overseas-licensed site “licensed” is not necessarily inaccurate; treating that word as proof that it is UK-regulated is.

The term “non-UK-regulated” is useful because it keeps the focus on the regulator’s location rather than making assumptions about a site’s quality or trustworthiness. It is a category, not a recommendation. Two casinos within it may have licences from different jurisdictions, and the category itself does not tell you whether either has a current licence or what its terms are. Those are questions about the individual operator, not part of the definition.

In short, a non-UK-regulated casino operates without UKGC oversight and may instead be licensed in a jurisdiction such as Malta, Curaçao, Gibraltar or Anjouan. “Licensed” and “UK-licensed” are not synonyms: the latter points specifically to the UKGC, while the former needs more context before you can tell which regulator is meant.

What a Casino Licence Does—and Does Not—Tell You

A casino licence is permission for an operator to provide gambling services under the rules of the authority that issued it. The issuing jurisdiction matters because the licence is tied to that authority’s legal framework and the activities it has authorised. The words “licensed casino” alone do not tell you which authority is involved, what the licence covers or whether the operator is authorised to serve customers in a particular market.

A licence badge does not provide universal approval to operate in every market; it only indicates that the operator is answerable to a specific regulator.

That distinction is easy to miss when a site displays a licence badge without much context. A licence may establish that an operator is answerable to a regulator somewhere, but it is not a universal approval to operate wherever its website can be reached. Nor does the label, by itself, tell you whether the licence applies to the company running the site, the gambling products it offers, or the country where you are located.

A licence has a jurisdiction

The regulator named on a licence is the starting point for understanding what the document means. A UK-issued licence and a licence issued elsewhere are not interchangeable simply because both are called casino licences. Each comes from a different legal system, and its authority is bounded by that system’s rules.

This is why “licensed” is an incomplete description. It answers only part of the question: licensed by whom? The answer identifies the jurisdiction whose rules govern the operator under that licence. It does not, on its own, establish that another country’s regulator has approved the same business or that the operator may offer gambling there.

A licence can also be described in broad terms on a casino website, while the actual permission belongs to a particular legal entity. A brand name and the company responsible for the service may not be the same thing. Treating the badge as a general endorsement of everything displayed under a brand can therefore lead to a mistaken impression of what has been authorised.

These details are not technical decoration. The issuing jurisdiction determines which authority is responsible for the licence and which rules the operator is expected to follow under it. If a site says only that it is licensed, without making clear who issued the licence, the statement gives you little basis for understanding the scope of that claim.

Casino Without a Swedish Licence: UK Legal Position

A foreign licence is not a UK permission

For customers in Great Britain, there is a separate and decisive question: does the operator hold the licence required to serve this market? Operators serving customers in Great Britain need a UK Gambling Commission licence, irrespective of where the business is based. A licence from another jurisdiction does not take the place of that requirement.

In other words, an online casino can hold a licence abroad and still not hold the UK authorisation relevant to serving Great Britain. The fact that its website accepts visitors, uses familiar payment methods or describes itself as licensed does not change which authority issued its licence. Access to a site and permission to serve a market are different things.

The phrase “UK casino licence” can also be used loosely in advertising or discussion. It should mean a licence issued by the UK Gambling Commission, not simply a licence held by a company that accepts customers who live in the UK. The location of the operator’s headquarters is not the test: the requirement applies to operators serving Great Britain, wherever they are based.

This distinction matters when a site presents an overseas licence as if it settles every question about its status. It may tell you something about the jurisdiction under which the operator claims to be licensed. It does not establish that the operator has the separate authorisation required for Great Britain. Those are two different claims, and one cannot be inferred from the other.

UK Market Requirements

Operators serving customers in Great Britain must hold a UK Gambling Commission licence, regardless of any overseas licences they may possess.

Read the claim narrowly

A licence label is useful only when you understand what it identifies. It can point to an issuing authority and a regulatory framework, but it should not be treated as a general seal of approval for every market, service or company associated with a casino brand. The word “licensed” is not a substitute for knowing who holds the licence and where that permission applies.

Nor should a licence from outside the UK be read as a UK online casino licence by another name. For Great Britain, the relevant distinction is whether the operator has authorisation from the UK Gambling Commission to serve customers here. An overseas licence may be real within its own jurisdiction; that fact alone does not answer the UK question.

So when a casino describes itself as licensed, keep the claim in its proper limits. It tells you something about where the operator says it is regulated. It does not, without more, tell you that it is authorised to serve Great Britain.

What UK Law Says About Using an Offshore Casino

The legal distinction is mainly about who is supplying the gambling service. The Gambling Act 2005 is directed at operators who provide gambling to the UK market, rather than at people who place bets or play games on a site. That does not make every overseas casino lawful to operate for UK customers; it means the rules on the operator and the position of an individual player are separate questions.

For a player, British law does not expressly make it an offence to use a gambling service licensed abroad. Nor does playing on a site that lacks UK authorisation, by itself, make the player a criminal under UK law. The absence of a player offence should not be mistaken for approval of the operator or a statement that its service is authorised in Britain.

This distinction matters when you encounter phrases such as “non-UK licensed casino” or “non-UKGC licensed casino”. They describe a site’s regulatory position, not a legal guarantee for you as a customer. An overseas licence may regulate the company under the rules of the place that issued it, but it does not settle whether the operator is entitled to target customers in Great Britain. Equally, the fact that a player is not committing a criminal offence does not turn an unlicensed service into a UK-authorised one.

The law’s focus on operators also means you should not infer that a site is suitable for British customers merely because it accepts a registration or allows access. An operator’s willingness to take a customer does not establish that the service complies with the rules applying to businesses supplying gambling in the UK. Legal responsibility for providing the service and the practical ability to use it are not the same thing.

A search for a “best non-UK licensed casino” can therefore blur questions that should be kept apart: where the operator is licensed, whether it may serve the relevant market, and what position you occupy as a player. A label alone answers only part of that picture.

You are responsible for checking the laws that apply where you live and for understanding the implications of using gambling services based overseas. The Gambling Act 2005 covers England, Wales and Scotland, but not Northern Ireland, so do not assume that a statement about the Act automatically applies throughout the UK. Where your circumstances or location make the position unclear, seek appropriate legal advice rather than treating a casino’s terms or marketing as a ruling on the law.

Attention: The fact that playing on an unlicensed site is not a criminal offence for the individual does not mean the operator is authorised to serve the UK market.

In short, the fact that UK law does not criminalise an individual player for using an unlicensed gambling site is narrower than it may sound. It concerns the player’s criminal liability; it does not certify the operator, confer UK authorisation or remove your need to consider the law that applies to you.

How UK Gambling Commission Licensing Differs

For a casino serving customers in Great Britain, the relevant permission is a licence from the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC). The operator’s headquarters do not change that requirement: a company based overseas still needs the appropriate UKGC licence if it offers gambling to customers in Great Britain. The distinction is about the market it serves, not simply where the business is established.

A UK Gambling Commission licensed casino is therefore different from a site that holds only an overseas authorisation. A licence issued by another jurisdiction does not become a UKGC licence, even if the site accepts customers from Britain or describes itself as licensed. The regulator named on the licence matters: an overseas licence and UKGC authorisation come from different authorities and do not mean the same thing.

The UKGC’s relevance is tied to operators serving Great Britain. Its licensing framework is not a general approval for every gambling business worldwide, nor does a UKGC licence cover an operator merely because it has a UK-facing website. The key question is whether the operator holds the relevant permission to provide gambling services in this market.

That helps make sense of phrases such as “casino operating licence” and “casino gaming licence”. They can refer to permission issued by different regulators, so the phrase alone does not identify who granted it or which market it covers. When a casino says it is licensed, look for the issuing authority and the company named as the licensee. A claim of being licensed somewhere is not, by itself, evidence of permission to serve Great Britain.

The same distinction applies to an operator’s casino licence application. Applying to a regulator is not the same as holding a licence, and an application to an overseas authority would not satisfy the UKGC requirement for an operator serving customers in Great Britain. The relevant point is the licence actually held, not a general statement that the business is seeking or has obtained approval elsewhere.

A “UK Gambling Commission licensed online casinos” list is useful only if it identifies the operator and the relevant UKGC permission, rather than grouping together sites licensed by different jurisdictions. The wording “licensed casino” can conceal a material difference unless the regulator is named. A casino may be authorised in one country and still lack the authorisation required to serve Great Britain.

This is a regulatory distinction, not a claim that every licensed site offers the same service or has identical terms. Nor does the existence of an overseas licence change which permission an operator needs for the British market. For a business serving Great Britain, the location of its base does not replace the UKGC requirement.

Assessing a Casino’s Terms Before You Play

A headline bonus is not the full offer. Before accepting one, read the terms attached to that specific promotion and check what you must do before any bonus-related winnings can be withdrawn. The important details are often in the wording beneath the offer, not in its advertised value.

Do

• Check if wagering applies to the bonus, deposit, or both
• Verify the deadline for completing requirements
• Confirm the maximum bet allowed during bonus play

Don’t

• Rely solely on the headline bonus value
• Assume all games contribute equally to wagering
• Expect a withdrawal to be unaffected by incomplete promotions

Start with the wagering requirement: the amount of qualifying bets required before the bonus, or winnings linked to it, can be withdrawn. The multiplier alone does not tell you how much betting is involved. Check the base it applies to. A requirement stated as 40x might be calculated on the bonus alone, on the bonus and your deposit together, or on the bonus and free spins together. Those are materially different calculations.

A specialist review has reported offshore welcome offers with requirements of 35x or more. That is a report about offers reviewed, not a standard applying to every casino or a promise that a current promotion has the same terms. Confirm the exact calculation in the operator’s own conditions. If the terms do not clearly say what the multiplier applies to, the advertised figure is not enough to assess the offer.

Also look for which games count towards wagering and whether different games contribute at different rates. Check the deadline for completing the requirement, any maximum bet while bonus funds are active, and what happens if you withdraw before finishing. These details can determine whether a bonus is usable at all. Do not assume that every bet contributes fully or that a withdrawal leaves the promotion unaffected.

Free spins need a separate check. They may have their own wagering requirement, and winnings may be subject to a withdrawal cap. One specialist review reported free-spin winnings carrying requirements of 30–50 times those winnings and caps of £5–£50. Treat those figures as reported examples, not fixed industry rules: the relevant promotion’s terms control. Check whether the cap applies to the winnings from each spin or to the overall free-spin award, and whether winnings must be converted into bonus funds before they can be withdrawn.

The same review source described free-spin packages expiring within 24–72 hours. An expiry can leave little time to use spins or complete any attached conditions, so check when the clock starts and what happens to unused spins. Promotion terms can change; read the current version before opting in and keep a copy. A large headline offer is only useful if its calculation, restrictions and expiry are clear enough for you to judge.

Curaçao Licences and Offshore Payment Options

Curaçao is one of several jurisdictions that may license non-UK-regulated casinos. A Curaçao licence and the payment methods a casino accepts are separate things: the licence identifies a regulatory framework, while the cashier shows which routes the operator currently offers. Neither fact, on its own, tells you whether a particular deposit method will also be available for withdrawals.

Offshore casinos may accept card payments, e-wallets, bank transfers and cryptocurrencies. Some transactions are handled through alternative processors rather than the payment provider you might expect. That can affect how a payment appears on a statement or how it is routed, so check the operator’s payment information before sending money. A familiar method is not proof that a payment will be reversible or that a later withdrawal will use the same route.

A Curaçao licence is a regulatory framework and does not guarantee specific payment methods or a "no-KYC" service.

Crypto is one option at some non-UK-regulated casinos. It can bypass the UK restriction on gambling deposits funded by credit card, but using cryptocurrency does not change the operator’s regulatory status. Nor does a Curaçao licence establish that a casino is a “no-KYC” service. KYC means “know your customer”: identity and address checks that an operator may require. A claim that a licensed crypto casino requires no checks should not be treated as a consequence of either its licence or its use of crypto.

The practical limits of crypto are different from those of a card or bank transfer. You need to understand the wallet and network selected, and make sure the details match the casino’s instructions. A payment sent through the wrong network or to an incorrect address may not be recoverable. The casino’s cashier and terms should also state how it handles crypto withdrawals; a supported deposit route does not guarantee that the same route can be used to cash out.

Some offshore casinos may also let customers charge a deposit to a mobile phone bill or take it from a prepaid balance. This option has been reported in a specialist review, but it should not be assumed to be broadly available or current. Check directly with the operator and your mobile or prepaid provider, including whether the transaction is treated as a purchase, what charges apply and whether the balance can be used for anything other than deposits.

Before paying, confirm the currency, processor, fees and withdrawal arrangements in the casino’s own terms. Payment options can change, and a method shown at deposit does not promise an equally straightforward withdrawal. A Curaçao casino licence is not a payment guarantee; the details of each route matter.

What an MGA Licence Means for UK Players

An MGA-licensed casino is licensed in Malta by the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA). Malta is one of several jurisdictions that may license non-UK-regulated casinos; others include Curaçao, Gibraltar and Anjouan. The label tells you which regulator issued the casino’s licence. It does not, by itself, establish that the operator is authorised to serve customers in Great Britain.

That distinction matters whether you use a website or an app. A casino app is another way of accessing the operator’s gambling service, not a separate licence category that changes where the operator is regulated. If an operator serves customers in Great Britain, it needs a UK Gambling Commission licence regardless of where the company is based or which other licences it holds. A Malta licence alone does not meet that requirement.

The same point applies to searches for a “small casino licence UK” or a “large casino licence UK”. The size of the business does not turn an overseas licence into UK authorisation. An operator may have a Malta licence and still need the relevant UKGC licence to serve the British market. The deciding issue is not whether the casino is small, large, mobile-friendly or based in Malta; it is whether the operator holds the required UK authorisation for its service to Great Britain.

For you, the practical task is to distinguish the regulator named in a casino’s materials from the regulator relevant to the market it serves. “MGA licensed” identifies an overseas licensing connection. It should not be read as shorthand for “UKGC licensed”, or as proof that the casino is authorised to offer gambling in Great Britain. If a site presents its Malta credentials prominently, that information can still be accurate while leaving the separate question of UK authorisation unanswered.

Licensing Distinction

An MGA licence identifies an overseas jurisdiction and is not a substitute for UKGC authorisation.

This is particularly easy to miss when an operator uses one brand across different countries or channels. A licence displayed in an app, on a desktop site or in promotional material may refer to the same overseas authorisation; changing the format does not make it a UK licence. Nor does the word “licensed” on its own identify which authority issued the licence.

So treat a Malta licence as a statement about the casino’s licensing jurisdiction, not as a substitute for UKGC authorisation. Those are distinct credentials, and the operator’s base of operation does not remove the requirement to hold a UK Gambling Commission licence when serving Great Britain.

Comparing Non-UKGC and UKGC Casino Licences

The central difference is which regulator oversees the operator. A casino with a UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) licence is authorised under the British regulatory system. A non-UKGC-licensed online casino operates without UKGC oversight, even if another jurisdiction has issued it a licence.

That distinction is about regulatory authority, not simply where a company is based. Operators serving customers in Great Britain need a UKGC licence regardless of their location. A licence from Malta or another overseas jurisdiction does not replace that requirement or turn the operator into a UKGC-regulated business.

It is therefore useful to separate two questions when comparing licences: who issued the licence, and what market does that authorise the operator to serve? The first identifies the regulator responsible for the licence. The second cannot be answered just by seeing a foreign regulator’s name or emblem on a casino website. An overseas licence and UKGC authorisation are different credentials, not interchangeable versions of the same approval.

For instance, a Malta-licensed online casino may hold authorisation from the Malta Gaming Authority. That tells you which jurisdiction issued its licence; it does not, by itself, establish UKGC oversight. Likewise, a casino describing itself as “licensed” has not necessarily shown that it holds the licence relevant to serving customers in Great Britain. The word on its own leaves out the important part: licensed by whom?

This matters when you encounter claims about an offshore licensed casino, including a no-deposit bonus or other promotion. An offer is not evidence of which regulator supervises the operator. Nor does a foreign licence become a UKGC licence because a site is accessible to you or presents its services in pounds. Those details do not change the issuing authority.

A useful comparison should name the regulator, rather than treating all licences as one general stamp of approval. If a casino refers to an overseas licence, read that as a statement about its overseas regulatory status. Do not infer from it that the UKGC has authorised or oversees the operator. Conversely, the relevant question for a business serving Great Britain is whether it holds a UKGC licence; its headquarters or other licences do not remove that requirement.

This is the limit of a licence comparison: it can clarify which regulator is involved, but the label alone does not establish that two systems offer equivalent oversight. An overseas licence may be genuine and still be distinct from UKGC authorisation. Keeping those points separate prevents “licensed” from doing more explanatory work than it can bear.

Our top casino picks for the UK

1. Chanze
   Bonus: Slots Welcome Bonus #1 200% up to €500 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
2. Zombillion
   Bonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
3. NightLuck
   Bonus: Welcome Pack + 805% Up To 6400€ + 280 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
4. Amunbet
   Bonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
5. Jetsetspins
   Bonus: 200% Bonus + 100 Free Spins + Free Royal Wheel · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
6. NightWin
   Bonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
7. EvoSpin
   Bonus: 125% up to €2500 + 125 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
8. Britsino
   Bonus: Welcome Package – Get your £2,200 + 2,000 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
9. BeOnBet
   Bonus: 100% up to €500 + 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days

The Safeguards You May Lose Outside the UKGC System

A UKGC-regulated casino must provide responsible-gambling protections required under the British system. At a non-UK-regulated casino, you may not have access to the same mandatory tools, such as deposit limits or operator-level self-exclusion. That difference matters most when you want to restrict your own gambling: a tool available at one site may not apply elsewhere.

Protection Risks

Outside the UKGC system, you may lose access to mandatory protections like operator-level self-exclusion and the Financial Ombudsman Service.

GamStop illustrates the limit. It is the UK Gambling Commission’s self-exclusion scheme, but Casinos not on GamStop are outside it. If you have registered with GamStop, do not assume that your exclusion will prevent you from opening an account at a site that does not participate. A block that works across participating UKGC-licensed operators is not a universal block on gambling online.

Support can also be harder to obtain if something goes wrong. Players using offshore casinos lose access to the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service and to the mandatory responsible-gambling tools required of UKGC-licensed operators. A complaint or request for help may therefore have fewer routes within the UK system. This is not the same as saying that every dispute will end badly; it means the protections and escalation options you might expect from a UKGC-regulated operator may not be available.

Data handling is another consideration. Non-UK-regulated casinos may follow less stringent responsible-gambling and data-protection rules than operators licensed by the UKGC. You may have less certainty about how your information is safeguarded and what support the operator must provide when gambling becomes harmful. The word “licensed” alone does not tell you that the protections are equivalent.

If you are deciding how to choose a safe, reputable online casino, start by asking what practical safeguards apply to you, not just what licence label appears on the site. Check whether you can set limits, exclude yourself and find clear routes for help. For a casino without a UK licence, do not assume those protections are built in or that UK services can step in if they are absent. A casino dealer licence, meanwhile, concerns an individual’s role in the industry; it is not a substitute for the operator’s player-protection obligations.

If you need to stop gambling, use support that is available to you and do not rely on GamStop to block sites that are outside its scheme. The inconvenience is real: a safeguard is useful only where it actually applies.

Checking a Licence and Knowing Where Complaints Go

To check whether an online casino is licensed, start with the regulator’s public register, rather than relying on a badge or licence number displayed on the casino’s website. Find the operator’s legal company name in the register and compare it with the company named in the site’s terms. A mismatch is a reason to pause: a licence may belong to a different business.

Check that the entry is current and covers the gambling activity in question. For an Anjouan casino licence, look up the entry in Anjouan’s public register and verify its expiry date as well as the company name. Anjouan authorisation does not permit an operator to serve the United Kingdom or other markets listed as restricted. A register entry is therefore not, by itself, evidence that a casino is authorised to operate in Great Britain.

There is no useful safety verdict in a headline count of licensed online casinos. The number does not tell you whether a particular company’s licence is current, whether it matches the site you are using, or whether that licence covers your location. For a casino serving Great Britain, check the UK Gambling Commission’s register for the operator. A licence from another jurisdiction is not a substitute.

It is also important to know what happens if a dispute arises. The Anjouan authority does not handle, mediate or decide player complaints. Anjouan-licensed casinos do not offer an independent dispute-resolution route comparable to services approved by the UK Gambling Commission. Under Anjouan’s framework, an operator must respond to a complaint within 30 calendar days; that requirement does not mean the authority will resolve the dispute if you remain dissatisfied.

Before depositing, identify the company you would be dealing with, the regulator listed for it, and the complaint route set out in the terms. If the register, company details and stated route do not align, do not treat the casino as verified. A licence check can clarify who issued the authorisation; it cannot create UK oversight where none exists.

What payment options are available at non-UK casinos?

You may find credit cards, e-wallets, bank transfers and cryptocurrencies, sometimes processed through alternative providers. Some casinos also accept payments charged to your phone bill or deducted from a prepaid balance.

Are non-UK-regulated casinos legal for UK players to use?

UK law does not explicitly prohibit you from using gambling services licensed in another country, and players do not commit a criminal offence by gambling on an unlicensed site. However, operators serving customers in Great Britain need a UK Gambling Commission licence.

Are sites that are not on GamStop legal for players in the UK to access?

Not being on GamStop means the site is outside the UK Gambling Commission’s self-exclusion scheme; it does not by itself determine whether the operator is authorised to serve you. Operators serving customers in Great Britain require a UK Gambling Commission licence, while players do not commit a criminal offence by gambling on an unlicensed site.

Are gaming sites not on GamStop permitted for UK players?

A site’s absence from GamStop does not itself establish that it is permitted to serve you. Operators serving customers in Great Britain require a UK Gambling Commission licence, and players do not commit a criminal offence by gambling on an unlicensed site.

Responsible Gambling

Written by the editors at Paylobby.